Legislature(2023 - 2024)BUTROVICH 205

03/29/2023 01:30 PM Senate JUDICIARY

Note: the audio and video recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.

Download Mp3. <- Right click and save file as

Audio Topic
01:30:36 PM Start
01:31:35 PM Consideration of Governor Appointees
01:51:03 PM SB53
02:12:41 PM Adjourn
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
Consideration of Governor’s Appointees:
Commission on Judicial Conduct
Todd Fletcher - Anchorage
-- Invited & Public Testimony --
Consideration of Governor’s Appointees: State
Board of Parole
Sarah Possenti - Fairbanks
-- Invited & Public Testimony --
+= SB 37 CRIME COUNTERFEIT/NONFUNCTIONING AIRBAG TELECONFERENCED
<Bill Hearing Canceled>
-- Testimony <Invitation Only> --
+= SB 53 FIVE-YEAR INVOLUNTARY COMMITMENTS TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
-- Testimony <Invitation Only> --
+ Bills Previously Heard/Scheduled TELECONFERENCED
            SB  53-FIVE-YEAR INVOLUNTARY COMMITMENTS                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
1:51:03 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR CLAMAN  announced the consideration  of SENATE BILL  NO. 53                                                               
"An Act relating to involuntary civil commitments."                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
He noted  that this was the  second hearing, he was  the sponsor,                                                               
and there  was a committee  substitute (CS) for the  committee to                                                               
consider. He asked Ms. Potter to proceed.                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
1:51:35 PM                                                                                                                    
EMMA   POTTER,  Staff,   Senator   Matt   Claman,  Alaska   State                                                               
Legislature, Juneau,  Alaska reviewed the changes  from version S                                                               
to version Y of SB 53.                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
     Section 1 (page 1, lines 5-14; page 2, lines 1-7):                                                                     
        • Amends subsection (a) to remove the requirement                                                                       
          that psychologists are "forensic" psychologists.                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
     Section 2 (page 2, lines 8-25):                                                                                        
        • Amends subsection (b) to remove the requirement                                                                       
          that  attorneys file  a motion  that is  "written"                                                                    
          when making a motion  for a judicial determination                                                                    
          of the competency of the defendant.                                                                                   
        • Amends subsection (b) to specify that the court                                                                       
          make findings of fact and  conclusions of law that                                                                    
          justify   an  examination   before  ordering   the                                                                    
          defendant examined for competency.                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
     Section 3 (page 2, lines 26-31; page 3, lines 1-17):                                                                   
        • New subsection (i) states that defendants may be                                                                      
          released   on  bail   conditions  for   outpatient                                                                    
          competency  examinations.  It states  that  before                                                                    
          releasing a defendant on  bail under this section,                                                                    
          the   court  shall   consider:  (1)   any  medical                                                                    
          information provided  by the Department  of Family                                                                    
          and  Community   Services;  (2)   the  defendant's                                                                    
          mental  condition; (3)  the  defendant's level  of                                                                    
          need  for  evaluation  and  treatment  under  this                                                                    
          chapter;   (4)   the    defendant's   ability   to                                                                    
          participate in  outpatient treatment; and  (5) the                                                                    
          defendant's  history of  evaluation and  treatment                                                                    
          under this chapter.                                                                                                   
        • New subsection (k) states that a court may rely                                                                       
          on  a defense  attorney's representation  that the                                                                    
          attorney    possesses    information,    including                                                                    
          privileged  information provided  at  an ex  parte                                                                    
          hearing  when  determining   bail  conditions  for                                                                    
          defendants under this section.                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
     Section 4 (page 3, lines 18-31; page 4, lines 1-10):                                                                   
        • Amends   (b)   to   conform   with   dangerousness                                                                    
          standards  created by  the legislation  and limits                                                                    
          the   arson  standard   to   felony  arson   only.                                                                    
          Defendants charged  with a felony  offense against                                                                    
          a person  or felony arson  may be committed  for a                                                                    
         total of two years for competency restoration.                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
1:53:25 PM                                                                                                                    
     Section 5 (page 4, lines 11-31; page 5, lines 1-6):                                                                    
        • Amends subsection (f) to state that before                                                                            
          releasing a defendant on  bail under this section,                                                                    
          the   court  shall   consider:  (1)   any  medical                                                                    
          information provided  by the Department  of Family                                                                    
          and  Community   Services;  (2)   the  defendant's                                                                    
          mental  condition; (3)  the  defendant's level  of                                                                    
          need  for  evaluation  and  treatment  under  this                                                                    
          chapter;   (4)   the    defendant's   ability   to                                                                    
          participate in  outpatient treatment; and  (5) the                                                                    
          defendant's  history of  evaluation and  treatment                                                                    
          under this chapter.                                                                                                   
        • Amends subsection (g) to limit the arson standard                                                                     
           to felony  arson only. This section  states that,                                                                    
           at the  expiration of the  competency restoration                                                                    
           period, the prosecutor shall: (1) file a petition                                                                    
           seeking involuntary  commitment under the  new AS                                                                    
           47.30.706 before dismissal of charges; (2) notify                                                                    
           the  civil  division  of the  Department  of  Law                                                                    
           within 24  hours after  filing the  petition; and                                                                    
           (3)  provide the  court's findings  to the  civil                                                                    
           division of the Department of Law within 24 hours                                                                    
           after the court's ruling.                                                                                            
     Section 6 (page 5, lines 7-31; page 6, lines 1-5):                                                                       
        • Creates a new section AS 47.30.706: Commitment                                                                        
          after finding of incompetence.                                                                                        
        • This section closes the period of time between a                                                                      
          criminal case  dismissal of  charges for  a felony                                                                    
          offense against  a person  or felony  arson, based                                                                    
          on an individual's incompetency,  and the start of                                                                    
          civil   commitment   proceedings.  Under   current                                                                    
          statute, there  is not a  process that  allows for                                                                    
          the  civil  commitment  proceedings to  begin  for                                                                    
          individuals  who   meet  the   dangerous  standard                                                                    
          without them being released to the public.                                                                            
        • The section states that: if a person is found                                                                         
          incompetent  to   proceed  on  a   felony  offense                                                                    
          against  a person  or  felony  arson, an  attorney                                                                    
          with the  Department of Law shall  file a petition                                                                    
          to  have  the  person  delivered  to  the  nearest                                                                    
          evaluation   facility.   Upon  receipt   of   this                                                                    
          petition,  the  court  shall  issue  an  ex  parte                                                                    
          order,  appoint an  attorney  for the  respondent,                                                                    
          and  may  direct the  peace  officer  to take  the                                                                    
          respondent into  custody and  deliver them  to the                                                                    
          nearest appropriate  facility for  evaluation. The                                                                    
          court shall set a date,  time, and place for a 30-                                                                    
          day  commitment  hearing,  to be  held  within  72                                                                    
          hours.  This  matches   the  current  statute  and                                                                    
          timeline for 30-day commitment hearings.                                                                              
        • This section includes language which states that                                                                      
          an  individual  charged   with  a  felony  offense                                                                    
          against a person  or felony arson who  is found to                                                                    
          be  incompetent  to   stand  trial  is  rebuttably                                                                    
          presumed  to   be  mentally  ill  and   present  a                                                                    
          likelihood  of serious  harm  to  self or  others.                                                                    
          This  creates the  basis by  which  the court  can                                                                    
          issue the  ex parte order and  initiate the 30-day                                                                    
          commitment proceedings.                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
     Section 7 (page 6, lines 6-11):                                                                                        
        • This  section amends  AS 47.30.710  subsection (a)                                                                    
          to  include   the  new   section  of   statute  AS                                                                    
          47.30.706:    Commitment    after    finding    of                                                                    
          incompetence.                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
     Section 8 (page 6, lines 12-22):                                                                                       
        • This  section  was  numbered   Section  6  in  the                                                                    
          previous bill version.                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
     Section 9 (page 6, lines 23-31; page 7, lines 1-28):                                                                   
        • This  section  was  numbered   Section  7  in  the                                                                    
          previous bill version.                                                                                                
        • Amends  section to  limit  the  arson standard  to                                                                    
          felony arson only.                                                                                                    
        • Amends   subsection   (a)   to  clarify   that   a                                                                    
          respondent is released  from involuntary treatment                                                                    
          at  the  expiration   of  the  180-day  commitment                                                                    
          period unless an  additional 180-day commitment is                                                                    
          petitioned  or a  commitment up  to five-years  is                                                                    
          petitioned, if the  individual meets the standards                                                                    
          of a five-year commitment.                                                                                            
        • Removes  "attempts  of  harm  to  self"  from  the                                                                    
          involuntary  commitment  standards for  additional                                                                    
          five-year involuntary commitment.                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
     Section 10 (page 7, lines 29-31; page 8, lines 1-3):                                                                   
        • This  section  was  numbered   Section  8  in  the                                                                    
          previous bill version.                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
     Section 11(page 8, lines 4-23):                                                                                       
        • This  section  was  numbered   Section  9  in  the                                                                    
          previous bill version.                                                                                                
        • Amends  section to  limit  the  arson standard  to                                                                    
          felony arson only.                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
     Section 12 (page 8, lines 24-31; page 9, lines 1-14):                                                                  
        • This  section  was  numbered  Section  10  in  the                                                                    
          previous bill version.                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
1:56:53 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR  CLAMAN  informed  the  committee  that  Mr.  Skidmore  was                                                               
available to answer questions.                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
1:57:07 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR TOBIN  asked about the  removal of the term   written  in                                                               
Section 2.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
MS. POTTER  replied that version  S included the  word  written.                                                                
The  Department  of  Law  (DOL) requested  the  addition  in  the                                                               
previous committee of referral. The  court makes findings of fact                                                               
and  conclusions of  law  that justify  examination  as a  better                                                               
approach.                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
1:58:23 PM                                                                                                                    
JOHN  SKIDMORE,  Deputy   Attorney  General,  Criminal  Division,                                                               
Alaska  Department  of Law,  Anchorage,  Alaska,  added that  the                                                               
concept  may lead  to  a  dramatic increase  in  requests for  an                                                               
evaluation of  incompetence. The  Department of Law  attempted to                                                               
allow courts  to make an  informed decision about whether  or not                                                               
such  requests are  based on  a  factual basis.  He informed  the                                                               
committee that adding the word   written  requires a rule change,                                                               
which slows the process and is not the department's intention.                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
1:59:42 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR CLAMAN  informed the  committee that  Nancy Meade  and Kaci                                                               
Schroeder were available to answer questions.                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR KIEHL  asked about  the time  required to  enter findings                                                               
and facts.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
2:00:43 PM                                                                                                                    
NANCY  MEADE,  General  Counsel, Department  of  Law,  Anchorage,                                                               
Alaska,  anticipated  that  most judges,  in  most  circumstances                                                               
would be able to make such a ruling during the hearing.                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
2:01:14 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR TOBIN  asked if  the five stipulations  in Section  3 are                                                               
considered during the process of determining competency.                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
MS.  MEADE did  not  anticipate that  the  stipulations would  be                                                               
discussed in  the same hearing.  She stated that  bail conditions                                                               
are  set beforehand  in most  circumstances. She  added that  the                                                               
defense  may propose  that the  defendant  is incompetent,  which                                                               
happens in a  different hearing. She pointed  out the flexibility                                                               
to amend  bail conditions. Occasionally,  a request to  amend the                                                               
bail conditions offers a condition for the delay.                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR CLAMAN  noted that  the factors  address the  bail decision                                                               
rather than the incompetency decisions.                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
MS.  MEADE added  that  AS 12.30  states that  when  a person  is                                                               
deemed incompetent,  the judge must  consider other  factors when                                                               
making  the bail  decision. Appropriate  bail conditions  protect                                                               
the community.                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
2:03:55 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR  KIEHL wondered  how frequently  a  person evaluated  for                                                               
competency is released on bail.                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
2:04:45 PM                                                                                                                    
MS.  MEADE replied  that some  defendants  are out  on their  own                                                               
recognizance  or  out on  bail  with  pre-trial supervision.  She                                                               
stated  that once  a person  claims incompetency,  a judge  finds                                                               
facts  and laws  to justify  an examination.  She noted  that for                                                               
some people  in jail, it  takes a  couple of weeks  to effectuate                                                               
that  evaluation, so  they are  out on  bail. Once  the claim  is                                                               
made, individuals are not necessarily detained in a hard bed.                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
2:05:45 PM                                                                                                                    
MR. SKIDMORE added that the concept  in Section 3 is less about a                                                               
person released on bail. He  informed the committee that Sections                                                               
3 and 5 make an outpatient  evaluation available. He noted that a                                                               
person out on conditions of  release and requesting an evaluation                                                               
must  present to  the Alaska  Psychiatric Institute  (API). If  a                                                               
person is  found to  be incompetent,  they must  stay at  API for                                                               
purposes of  attempting a restoration.  He stated that  Section 3                                                               
addresses the  option of an  outpatient clinic (page 2,  line 28)                                                               
or facility conducting the examination.                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
MR. SKIDMORE shared  that Section 5 had a  provision allowing for                                                               
outpatient  restoration services.  He  mentioned the  significant                                                               
waitlist  for evaluation  and restoration  in  Alaska. Section  5                                                               
attempts to  expand the services available  to provide evaluation                                                               
or  restoration services.  He noted  that if  outpatient services                                                               
were  appropriate,  that person  would  not  be in  custody.  The                                                               
provisions attempt to guide a release assessment.                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
2:08:00 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR KIEHL asked if outpatient options exist in Alaska.                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
MR.  SKIDMORE  replied that  some  providers  and facilities  can                                                               
conduct  examinations on  an outpatient  basis.  He guessed  that                                                               
some  providers  or  facilities   may  be  capable  of  providing                                                               
restoration  services.  He  noted that  Alaska  statutes  require                                                               
assessments to be done at  API facilities. The provision attempts                                                               
to expand those entities capable  of performing such examinations                                                               
or restoration services.                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
2:08:50 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR  CLAMAN added  that restoration  services might  facilitate                                                               
competency restoration  for a person  who can be  released safely                                                               
to  the  community.  The restoration  services  would  prevent  a                                                               
person from sitting in jail  waiting for a competency restoration                                                               
from API.                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
2:09:38 PM                                                                                                                    
MS. MEADE added  that incomplete data showed 25  percent of those                                                               
ordered  to receive  a competency  examination were  found to  be                                                               
competent by the examining physician or facility.                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
2:10:24 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR  TOBIN asked  about  Section 6,  which  indicates that  a                                                               
person  would be  delivered to  the nearest  evaluation facility.                                                               
She queried the  next step if the nearest  evaluation facility is                                                               
at capacity.                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MS.  POTTER referred  to  subsection (c)  stating  that a  person                                                               
taken into  custody for evaluation may  not be placed in  jail or                                                               
another  correctional  facility  except  for  protective  custody                                                               
purposes  and  while  awaiting transportation  to  an  evaluation                                                               
facility.                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
2:11:26 PM                                                                                                                    
VICE-CHAIR  KIEHL moved  to adopt  the committee  substitute (CS)                                                               
for SB 53, work order 33-LS0172\Y, as the working document.                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR CLAMAN found no objection and version Y was adopted.                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR CLAMAN  held SB  53 in  committee for  future consideration                                                               
and set an amendment deadline.                                                                                                  

Document Name Date/Time Subjects
Commission on Judicial Conduct Appointment - Todd Fletcher Resume 3.28.2023.pdf SJUD 3/29/2023 1:30:00 PM
State Board of Parole Appointment - Sarah Possenti Resume 3.28.2023.pdf SJUD 3/29/2023 1:30:00 PM
SB 53 Work Draft Committee Substitute version Y 3.29.2023.pdf SJUD 3/29/2023 1:30:00 PM
SB 53
SB 53 Explanation of Changes version S to version Y 3.29.2023.pdf SJUD 3/29/2023 1:30:00 PM
SB 53
SB 53 version S 3.10.2023.PDF SJUD 3/10/2023 1:30:00 PM
SJUD 3/29/2023 1:30:00 PM
SB 53
SB 53 Sponsor Statement version S 3.10.2023.pdf SJUD 3/10/2023 1:30:00 PM
SJUD 3/29/2023 1:30:00 PM
SB 53
SB 53 Sectional Analysis version S 3.10.2023.pdf SJUD 3/10/2023 1:30:00 PM
SJUD 3/29/2023 1:30:00 PM
SB 53
SB 53 Supporting Document - Frequently Asked Questions 3.10.2023.pdf SFIN 5/3/2023 9:00:00 AM
SJUD 3/10/2023 1:30:00 PM
SJUD 3/29/2023 1:30:00 PM
SB 53
SB 53 Research - KTUU Article 2.15.2022.pdf SFIN 5/3/2023 9:00:00 AM
SHSS 2/21/2023 3:30:00 PM
SJUD 3/10/2023 1:30:00 PM
SJUD 3/29/2023 1:30:00 PM
SB 53
SB 53 Research - NCSL Spreadsheet State Involuntary Commitment Timelines 3.13.2023.pdf SJUD 3/29/2023 1:30:00 PM
SB 53
SB 53 Research - NCSL Involuntary Commitment Timeline Maximums 3.13.2023.pdf SFIN 5/3/2023 9:00:00 AM
SJUD 3/29/2023 1:30:00 PM
SB 53
SB 53 Research - Forensic Psychiatric Hospital Feasibility Study Draft Phase 1 Report 2.1.2019.pdf SFIN 5/3/2023 9:00:00 AM
SJUD 3/29/2023 1:30:00 PM
SB 53
SB 53 Research - NCSL Competency to Stand Trial General Overview 11.1.2022.pdf SFIN 5/3/2023 9:00:00 AM
SJUD 3/29/2023 1:30:00 PM
SB 53
SB 53 Research - CSG Competency Report 10.1.2020.pdf SFIN 5/3/2023 9:00:00 AM
SJUD 3/29/2023 1:30:00 PM
SB 53
SB 53 Opposing Document - Letters Received as of 3.10.2023.pdf SJUD 3/29/2023 1:30:00 PM
SB 53
SB 53 Fiscal Note DOA-OPA 2.17.2023.pdf SJUD 3/29/2023 1:30:00 PM
SB 53
SB 53 Fiscal Note DOA-PDA 2.17.2023.pdf SJUD 3/29/2023 1:30:00 PM
SB 53
SB 53 Fiscal Note FCS-API 3.10.2023.pdf SJUD 3/29/2023 1:30:00 PM
SB 53
SB 53 Fiscal Note LAW-CJL 2.17.2023.pdf SJUD 3/29/2023 1:30:00 PM
SB 53